Mental Health

For at least the last ten years, reform of the legislation surrounding mental health services has been under discussion.  A number of Bills have been proposed and put before Parliament only to provoke a hostile reaction.  We have another proposal before Parliament at the moment and more hostility.

Initially, in the early days of the New Labout government, it appeared that reforms would be liberal and informed by the need to reflect the shift to care in the community in the form that legislation took.  It would, for instance, strengthen the duty to provide care etc.  But to illustrate how fragile are the minds of ministers, one incident changed everything.

The double murder of Lin and Megan Russell occurred and a man, Michael Stone, was found guilty of the crime in 1998.  It appears that he had an untreatable Severe Personality Disorder.  Since he could not be treated, he was not in a secure mental health hospital.  This one incident changed the tone of the debate.  Now it became dominated by concerns about public safety rather than treatment.  Subsequent Bills have all sought to grant powers to the state to detain people even when they can not be treated and before they have committed any offence.

There are two things to note here.  First, it is not clear what a Severe Personality Disorder is and how they can be identified.  Second, Michael Stone was convicted largely on the testimony of one man, a fellow prisoner, who said that Michael Stone had confessed to the crime while in prison on remand.  The prisoner concerned since appears to have received a shorter sentence.  The case is currently before the Criminal Cases Review Commission.  Anyone with a passing knowledge of the history of wrongful convictions in this country will recognise this case as fitting into a familiar pattern.

So has a debate on reform has become highjacked by a red herring?  I would argue it has.

Advertisements

1 Response to “Mental Health”


  1. 1 christina April 25, 2007 at 11:55 am

    Completely agree – yet another example of the political agenda being hijacked by the media’s largely ignorant coverage of one event. Not that this excuses Ministers who should be attempting at least to resist a knee jerk response. As you say the over all impact of this has been that very little has been done to improve mental health services over the last few years and worse still the public debate on this issue has focused on the image of those with mental health disorders as violent and dangerous. The facts are that most of us will experience an episode of poor mental health at least once in our lives and yet public services in this area continue to be poorly resourced and organised and their users largely misrepresented and misunderstood.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s





%d bloggers like this: